The RPG genre is one that is filled with variety; from the large open-world scale of Fallout, Borderlands and The Elder Scrolls series, to the moral decision making of Mass Effect and Dragon Age - the amount of freedom and player choice offered within these games is staggering. Even RPGs on a smaller scale, such as The Wolf Among Us or the more recent Tales from the Borderlands, offer an insane amount of choice. We all know that the modern RPG is built around this core mechanic of player choice and so my question, one that I have asked myself time again is, can there be a strict canon within an RPG?
However, the most recent article from Polygon (which I'm sure most of you will have seen by now), has gotten me thinking. In it, they say that Commander Shepard from the Mass Effect series was originally developed as a female. No big deal right, right? In the game you can choose between either a male or female Shepard. They're both the exact same person regardless of gender, one isn't more canon than the other. But, some fans on various platforms have taken this to mean that female Shepard is indeed the canon Shepard. If enough fans converge on a particular choice, does that make it canon? Not by development standard but by fandom standards? Perhaps this is the massive male Shepard fan in me talking (I've only made 2 female Shepards in my very numerous playthroughs) because I can't tell you how many times I've been looked at weirdly because I say I play as a male Shepard and prefer it.
Does this apply to other RPGs - in Skyrim for example, if it emerged that enough people played as a Khajiit who sided with the Stormcloaks, would these become the "canon" accepted choices or would the breadth and freedom of the series prevail? Or perhaps this is an issue reserved solely for BioWare games?
So, can there be a canon in an RPG? In a developer sense, no. But in a fandom sense? The floor is open.
Choices. Choices. Choices...
Let us know in the comments below, or come find us on Facebook or Twitter!